<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Ethics: Resources to Help You Stay Out of Trouble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pamorama.net/2010/03/01/social-media-ethics-resources-to-help-you-stay-out-of-trouble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2010/03/01/social-media-ethics-resources-to-help-you-stay-out-of-trouble/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=social-media-ethics-resources-to-help-you-stay-out-of-trouble</link>
	<description>Building buzz in a connected world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disclosure &#38; Social Media Ethics: Do You Kiss and Tell? Tricomm Strategies</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2010/03/01/social-media-ethics-resources-to-help-you-stay-out-of-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-4047</link>
		<dc:creator>Disclosure &#38; Social Media Ethics: Do You Kiss and Tell? Tricomm Strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=2208#comment-4047</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Media Ethics to Keep You Out of Trouble [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Media Ethics to Keep You Out of Trouble [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2010/03/01/social-media-ethics-resources-to-help-you-stay-out-of-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-3667</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=2208#comment-3667</guid>
		<description>Perfect! Thanks for the feedback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect! Thanks for the feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam Dyer</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2010/03/01/social-media-ethics-resources-to-help-you-stay-out-of-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-3668</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam Dyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=2208#comment-3668</guid>
		<description>Yes! An example of needing to disclose would be if, for example, Chris Brogan paid me a fee to review his new book. I write a glowing review, urging readers to buy it, but I don&#039;t divulge the fact that Chris paid me. (And/or I provide an affiliate link which isn&#039;t identified as an affiliate link.) These things would put me on a slippery slope as far as the FTC is concerned. But in your case, it doesn&#039;t sound like you&#039;re doing anything like this -- you&#039;re writing a review of something that you think is valuable for your readers and there aren&#039;t any strings attached. Make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! An example of needing to disclose would be if, for example, Chris Brogan paid me a fee to review his new book. I write a glowing review, urging readers to buy it, but I don&#8217;t divulge the fact that Chris paid me. (And/or I provide an affiliate link which isn&#8217;t identified as an affiliate link.) These things would put me on a slippery slope as far as the FTC is concerned. But in your case, it doesn&#8217;t sound like you&#8217;re doing anything like this &#8212; you&#8217;re writing a review of something that you think is valuable for your readers and there aren&#8217;t any strings attached. Make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2010/03/01/social-media-ethics-resources-to-help-you-stay-out-of-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-3669</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=2208#comment-3669</guid>
		<description>Gotcha! Sounds like the key is disclosing the partnerships. So if I have no relationship (and just use a plain non-affiliated link) with the review I am writing about, then I am all clear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotcha! Sounds like the key is disclosing the partnerships. So if I have no relationship (and just use a plain non-affiliated link) with the review I am writing about, then I am all clear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam Dyer</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2010/03/01/social-media-ethics-resources-to-help-you-stay-out-of-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-3670</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam Dyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=2208#comment-3670</guid>
		<description>The FTC is cracking down on bloggers vis a vis disclosure. In your case: if you write a glowing review for XYZ product on your blog and you&#039;re paid by the company that produces it to write that review, you have to make it very clear that it&#039;s a paid review. If you don&#039;t do this and/or you include an affiliate like without identifying it as such, the FTC won&#039;t be pleased. So it&#039;s about being upfront and open about disclosure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FTC is cracking down on bloggers vis a vis disclosure. In your case: if you write a glowing review for XYZ product on your blog and you&#8217;re paid by the company that produces it to write that review, you have to make it very clear that it&#8217;s a paid review. If you don&#8217;t do this and/or you include an affiliate like without identifying it as such, the FTC won&#8217;t be pleased. So it&#8217;s about being upfront and open about disclosure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thevictorchen</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2010/03/01/social-media-ethics-resources-to-help-you-stay-out-of-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-3131</link>
		<dc:creator>thevictorchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=2208#comment-3131</guid>
		<description>Perfect! Thanks for the feedback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect! Thanks for the feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam Dyer</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2010/03/01/social-media-ethics-resources-to-help-you-stay-out-of-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-3133</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam Dyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=2208#comment-3133</guid>
		<description>Yes! An example of needing to disclose would be if, for example, Chris Brogan paid me a fee to review his new book. I write a glowing review, urging readers to buy it, but I don&#039;t divulge the fact that Chris paid me. (And/or I provide an affiliate link which isn&#039;t identified as an affiliate link.) These things would put me on a slippery slope as far as the FTC is concerned. But in your case, it doesn&#039;t sound like you&#039;re doing anything like this -- you&#039;re writing a review of something that you think is valuable for your readers and there aren&#039;t any strings attached. Make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! An example of needing to disclose would be if, for example, Chris Brogan paid me a fee to review his new book. I write a glowing review, urging readers to buy it, but I don&#39;t divulge the fact that Chris paid me. (And/or I provide an affiliate link which isn&#39;t identified as an affiliate link.) These things would put me on a slippery slope as far as the FTC is concerned. But in your case, it doesn&#39;t sound like you&#39;re doing anything like this &#8212; you&#39;re writing a review of something that you think is valuable for your readers and there aren&#39;t any strings attached. Make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thevictorchen</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2010/03/01/social-media-ethics-resources-to-help-you-stay-out-of-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-3132</link>
		<dc:creator>thevictorchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=2208#comment-3132</guid>
		<description>Gotcha! Sounds like the key is disclosing the partnerships. So if I have no relationship (and just use a plain non-affiliated link) with the review I am writing about, then I am all clear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotcha! Sounds like the key is disclosing the partnerships. So if I have no relationship (and just use a plain non-affiliated link) with the review I am writing about, then I am all clear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam Dyer</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2010/03/01/social-media-ethics-resources-to-help-you-stay-out-of-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-3129</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam Dyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=2208#comment-3129</guid>
		<description>The FTC is cracking down on bloggers vis a vis disclosure. In your case: if you write a glowing review for XYZ product on your blog and you&#039;re paid by the company that produces it to write that review, you have to make it very clear that it&#039;s a paid review. If you don&#039;t do this and/or you include an affiliate like without identifying it as such, the FTC won&#039;t be pleased. So it&#039;s about being upfront and open about disclosure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FTC is cracking down on bloggers vis a vis disclosure. In your case: if you write a glowing review for XYZ product on your blog and you&#39;re paid by the company that produces it to write that review, you have to make it very clear that it&#39;s a paid review. If you don&#39;t do this and/or you include an affiliate like without identifying it as such, the FTC won&#39;t be pleased. So it&#39;s about being upfront and open about disclosure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thevictorchen</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2010/03/01/social-media-ethics-resources-to-help-you-stay-out-of-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-3128</link>
		<dc:creator>thevictorchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=2208#comment-3128</guid>
		<description>Awesome, but what makes for bad ethics? If I run a simple personal blog, could I be running into any trouble?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, but what makes for bad ethics? If I run a simple personal blog, could I be running into any trouble?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

