<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beaten to the Tweet: Twitter Cybersquatters Have Hijacked Brands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pamorama.net/2009/11/13/beaten-to-the-tweet-twitter-cybersquatters-have-hijacked-brands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2009/11/13/beaten-to-the-tweet-twitter-cybersquatters-have-hijacked-brands/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=beaten-to-the-tweet-twitter-cybersquatters-have-hijacked-brands</link>
	<description>marketing, life, social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james@ladies designer watches</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2009/11/13/beaten-to-the-tweet-twitter-cybersquatters-have-hijacked-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>james@ladies designer watches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=551#comment-389</guid>
		<description>This was always going to happen....I wonder if Twitter will implement anything whereby users have to find some way of verifying who they are?  maybe some sort of paid service for big brands will put of the frauds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was always going to happen&#8230;.I wonder if Twitter will implement anything whereby users have to find some way of verifying who they are?  maybe some sort of paid service for big brands will put of the frauds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james@ladies designer watches</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2009/11/13/beaten-to-the-tweet-twitter-cybersquatters-have-hijacked-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-3739</link>
		<dc:creator>james@ladies designer watches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=551#comment-3739</guid>
		<description>This was always going to happen....I wonder if Twitter will implement anything whereby users have to find some way of verifying who they are?  maybe some sort of paid service for big brands will put of the frauds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was always going to happen&#8230;.I wonder if Twitter will implement anything whereby users have to find some way of verifying who they are?  maybe some sort of paid service for big brands will put of the frauds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Safety vests</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2009/11/13/beaten-to-the-tweet-twitter-cybersquatters-have-hijacked-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Safety vests</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=551#comment-382</guid>
		<description>This is strange but because of these only twiiter has started putting the band of “Verified” on the accounts which twitter thinks of any big brand or celebrities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is strange but because of these only twiiter has started putting the band of “Verified” on the accounts which twitter thinks of any big brand or celebrities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Safety vests</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2009/11/13/beaten-to-the-tweet-twitter-cybersquatters-have-hijacked-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-3738</link>
		<dc:creator>Safety vests</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=551#comment-3738</guid>
		<description>This is strange but because of these only twiiter has started putting the band of “Verified” on the accounts which twitter thinks of any big brand or celebrities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is strange but because of these only twiiter has started putting the band of “Verified” on the accounts which twitter thinks of any big brand or celebrities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amby@black twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2009/11/13/beaten-to-the-tweet-twitter-cybersquatters-have-hijacked-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>amby@black twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=551#comment-373</guid>
		<description>This is strange but because of these only twiiter has started putting the band of &quot;Verified&quot; on the accounts which twitter thinks of any big brand or celebrities.

Thanks for the resouce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is strange but because of these only twiiter has started putting the band of &#8220;Verified&#8221; on the accounts which twitter thinks of any big brand or celebrities.</p>
<p>Thanks for the resouce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amby@black twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2009/11/13/beaten-to-the-tweet-twitter-cybersquatters-have-hijacked-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-3737</link>
		<dc:creator>amby@black twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=551#comment-3737</guid>
		<description>This is strange but because of these only twiiter has started putting the band of &quot;Verified&quot; on the accounts which twitter thinks of any big brand or celebrities.

Thanks for the resouce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is strange but because of these only twiiter has started putting the band of &#8220;Verified&#8221; on the accounts which twitter thinks of any big brand or celebrities.</p>
<p>Thanks for the resouce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chandan</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2009/11/13/beaten-to-the-tweet-twitter-cybersquatters-have-hijacked-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>chandan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=551#comment-341</guid>
		<description>I first visit your blog and get really very interesting. Yes I am listening about twitter hijacking . Thank you for the post on twitter hijacking.
.-= chandan´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://internetjobscams.blogspot.com/2009/11/15-most-effective-twitter-tools.html&quot;&gt;15 most effective twitter tools&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first visit your blog and get really very interesting. Yes I am listening about twitter hijacking . Thank you for the post on twitter hijacking.<br />
.-= chandan´s last blog ..<a href="http://internetjobscams.blogspot.com/2009/11/15-most-effective-twitter-tools.html">15 most effective twitter tools</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chandan</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2009/11/13/beaten-to-the-tweet-twitter-cybersquatters-have-hijacked-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-3736</link>
		<dc:creator>chandan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=551#comment-3736</guid>
		<description>I first visit your blog and get really very interesting. Yes I am listening about twitter hijacking . Thank you for the post on twitter hijacking.
.-= chandan´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://internetjobscams.blogspot.com/2009/11/15-most-effective-twitter-tools.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;15 most effective twitter tools&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first visit your blog and get really very interesting. Yes I am listening about twitter hijacking . Thank you for the post on twitter hijacking.<br />
.-= chandan´s last blog ..<a href="http://internetjobscams.blogspot.com/2009/11/15-most-effective-twitter-tools.html" rel="nofollow">15 most effective twitter tools</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boomerblogger</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2009/11/13/beaten-to-the-tweet-twitter-cybersquatters-have-hijacked-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>boomerblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=551#comment-317</guid>
		<description>Twitter accused me of being a cybersquatter on some domains of my own! It takes awhile to clear this up when you have been suspended and the funny thing is that the name I did cybersquat on with a major brand name is still active. I suspect it wont be for long but I constantly tweet on it so maybe as long as there is activity I will be ok. As for these major companies that had their names pirated by squatters, that&#039;s what happens when you have a clueless marketing dept.
.-= boomerblogger´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lowcarbgolfer.com/golf-gifts/experienced-professional-golf-balls/&quot;&gt;Experienced Professional Golf Balls&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter accused me of being a cybersquatter on some domains of my own! It takes awhile to clear this up when you have been suspended and the funny thing is that the name I did cybersquat on with a major brand name is still active. I suspect it wont be for long but I constantly tweet on it so maybe as long as there is activity I will be ok. As for these major companies that had their names pirated by squatters, that&#8217;s what happens when you have a clueless marketing dept.<br />
.-= boomerblogger´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.lowcarbgolfer.com/golf-gifts/experienced-professional-golf-balls/">Experienced Professional Golf Balls</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Schaefer</title>
		<link>http://www.pamorama.net/2009/11/13/beaten-to-the-tweet-twitter-cybersquatters-have-hijacked-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-3735</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Schaefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamorama.net/?p=551#comment-3735</guid>
		<description>Twitter accused me of being a cybersquatter on some domains of my own! It takes awhile to clear this up when you have been suspended and the funny thing is that the name I did cybersquat on with a major brand name is still active. I suspect it wont be for long but I constantly tweet on it so maybe as long as there is activity I will be ok. As for these major companies that had their names pirated by squatters, that&#039;s what happens when you have a clueless marketing dept.
.-= boomerblogger´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lowcarbgolfer.com/golf-gifts/experienced-professional-golf-balls/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Experienced Professional Golf Balls&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter accused me of being a cybersquatter on some domains of my own! It takes awhile to clear this up when you have been suspended and the funny thing is that the name I did cybersquat on with a major brand name is still active. I suspect it wont be for long but I constantly tweet on it so maybe as long as there is activity I will be ok. As for these major companies that had their names pirated by squatters, that&#8217;s what happens when you have a clueless marketing dept.<br />
.-= boomerblogger´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.lowcarbgolfer.com/golf-gifts/experienced-professional-golf-balls/" rel="nofollow">Experienced Professional Golf Balls</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
